At Geehall One

All things relating to @geehall1 social media/projects 
« Back to blog

Thoughts On Country Telecommunications

At a housing workshop in Kinglake West last July, I talked with some of the locals about how the telecommunications infrastructure in that region had been rendered inoperable as the Black Saturday bushfires destroyed the local towers.

Yesterday, the anniversary of Black Saturday, I talked to another local at the same Kinglake West hall and heard about how even landline phones stopped that horrible day in February 2009.

The sad part about current telecoms technology is that it is vulnerable to natural disaster.  It can be knocked out by bushfire, by earthquake (rare in Victoria Australia, but frequent in other countries) or by anything that can wipe out terrestrial communications systems.

I won't criticize telcos for such cases.  But I might recommend they eventually look to systems less prone to being wiped by natural disasters at some stage.

In an age where the mobile phone is supplanting the ever-reliable cabled landline, it's important to look at the need for good mobile/cellular communications even in country areas...especially when they're the only thing possible for someone to be warned of an impending bushfire.  It's BEFORE a bushfire you need your mobile phone to be able to get a signal in such areas.

At the Kinglake West hall last July, Virgin/Optus worked enough for me to use a GPRS signal for my wireless internet.  On the same day, a shift of a few metres rendered one bar of Telstra NextG signal useless.  Yesterday,  my new mobile carrier, Vodafone, registered "No Signal" in Flowerdale and only five minutes of one-bar signal in the centre of Kinglake.

In my home town of Bairnsdale Vodafone gets a strong Edge presence, while Optus and GPRS make internet usage via wireless dongle almost as much fun as watching a snail race. The town is at least on one of the major highways.

Up on the mountain, north of Melbourne and not very close to a major highway, mobile service is so patchy it makes you miss the days of analogue mobiles and CDMA.

Sadly, newer technologies miss out on range and not every country-dweller lives on a highway.

Should our country cousins miss out on decent mobile signal?  If one thing was shown us by a year ago, no they should not.

It's one thing if a natural disaster affects telecoms.  It's another if you don't have great mobile systems in some areas because you don't think such areas "profitable."

Yet, if a corporation trades in our country, it's not that bad an idea to put something back into the local community.  If you show your social credentials, we're more likely to buy from you.

So...Telstra, Vodafone and Optus...have a think about it.  Could you be doing a better job providing GOOD telecommunications in such country towns especially after Black Saturday, giving us the tools to be warned about impending disaster?  And could we have saner roaming costs that aren't so prohibitive that we switch roaming off?

Really, guys, give it a think.  Before we ever see any natural disaster as bad as Black Saturday ever again.  You may save lives and customers by doing so.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (2)

Feb 08, 2010
mr_billiam said...
I agree that as it stands, the mobile reception in some places of outer Melbourne and beyond to rural areas needs much improvement.

To talk from direct experience, in Mt Evelyn there isn't any carrier with decent reception to the entire town. My phone (Optus) gets no service at all other than on the table in a certain corner of one room where it gets unstable reception at times. Telstra's Next G network gets slightly more but no less patchy reception around the place. This is also the side of Mt Evelyn which is most at risk from bushfires and has been affected by them many times in the past.

The frustrating thing about this is that it's not just telcos working against us. Both Telstra and Optus have recently installed new towers in Mt Evelyn after years of fighting residents who don't want mobile towers anywhere in the town, and ultimately installing directional towers (which until recently I wasn't aware existed) which don't service the side of town with no reception at all.

I think as an issue of public safety, it should be a priority for major carriers to service areas like this close to and away from the city to make sure that people are as connected as possible in case of emergencies of any kind.

Feb 08, 2010
George Hall said...
Thanks for your input, Bill. An outer suburb illustrates the point even more.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     twitter